<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: motorazr.com vs. Motorola: the verdict is in!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vincentnguyen.com/motorazrcom-vs-motorola-the-verdict-is-in-2007138.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vincentnguyen.com/motorazrcom-vs-motorola-the-verdict-is-in-2007138.php</link>
	<description>a technology blogger, social media evangelist, &#38; entrepreneur</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: budiputra.com :: Steve Jobs vs MYiPhone Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.vincentnguyen.com/motorazrcom-vs-motorola-the-verdict-is-in-2007138.php/comment-page-1#comment-10878</link>
		<dc:creator>budiputra.com :: Steve Jobs vs MYiPhone Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 08:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincentnguyen.com/motorazrcom-vs-motorola-the-verdict-is-in-2007138.php#comment-10878</guid>
		<description>[...] Actually, for blogger Nguyen, this is just another domain name disputes. He&#8217;s already scored one victory against Motorola in a similar dispute. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Actually, for blogger Nguyen, this is just another domain name disputes. He&#8217;s already scored one victory against Motorola in a similar dispute. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shamu</title>
		<link>http://www.vincentnguyen.com/motorazrcom-vs-motorola-the-verdict-is-in-2007138.php/comment-page-1#comment-3974</link>
		<dc:creator>Shamu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincentnguyen.com/motorazrcom-vs-motorola-the-verdict-is-in-2007138.php#comment-3974</guid>
		<description>I can completely relate to your UDRP case with Motorola.

This is what has happened to me:

Anheuser Bush, Inc. filed (and won) a claim against me through NARB to reverse name hijack (and take over) my domain name: shamu.tv (which was available for purchase for over a year before I bought it). Shamu (is a legitimate name, and .tv stands for an island - Tivoli) has been my nickname for 30 years and I purchased this name solely as a blog for my friends/family to keep up with me (no association with Seaworld). I submitted massive documentation proving that Shamu has been my name for thirty years.  I also responded correctly (and on time) but still the NARB decided for Seaworld.  

Since they won, I want to take this case to court. This case of monopolizing the internet has caused me hundreds of hours of work and stress. The trouble is, I cannot afford a large retainer fee for an attorney. I have been told by several (non-cyberspace) attorneys  
that this case would bring notoriety (and probable financial gain) to the attorney that takes it.  I have also been told that I have an excellent case (with tons of evidence).  I just want justice against these corporate conglomerate bullies and my name back!

How is it possible that corporate giants with their overpayed in-house counsel can attack and take everything from an average citizen?

Does anyone know any attorneys who might be interested in the publicity of going after Anheuser Bush, Inc/Seaworld. and seeking justice for the little guy ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can completely relate to your UDRP case with Motorola.</p>
<p>This is what has happened to me:</p>
<p>Anheuser Bush, Inc. filed (and won) a claim against me through NARB to reverse name hijack (and take over) my domain name: shamu.tv (which was available for purchase for over a year before I bought it). Shamu (is a legitimate name, and .tv stands for an island - Tivoli) has been my nickname for 30 years and I purchased this name solely as a blog for my friends/family to keep up with me (no association with Seaworld). I submitted massive documentation proving that Shamu has been my name for thirty years.  I also responded correctly (and on time) but still the NARB decided for Seaworld.  </p>
<p>Since they won, I want to take this case to court. This case of monopolizing the internet has caused me hundreds of hours of work and stress. The trouble is, I cannot afford a large retainer fee for an attorney. I have been told by several (non-cyberspace) attorneys<br />
that this case would bring notoriety (and probable financial gain) to the attorney that takes it.  I have also been told that I have an excellent case (with tons of evidence).  I just want justice against these corporate conglomerate bullies and my name back!</p>
<p>How is it possible that corporate giants with their overpayed in-house counsel can attack and take everything from an average citizen?</p>
<p>Does anyone know any attorneys who might be interested in the publicity of going after Anheuser Bush, Inc/Seaworld. and seeking justice for the little guy ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gizmodo</title>
		<link>http://www.vincentnguyen.com/motorazrcom-vs-motorola-the-verdict-is-in-2007138.php/comment-page-1#comment-1640</link>
		<dc:creator>Gizmodo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vincentnguyen.com/motorazrcom-vs-motorola-the-verdict-is-in-2007138.php#comment-1640</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Motorola vs. Motorazr.com: Round 1 Goes Against Motorola...&lt;/strong&gt;

Remember the case of Motorola trying to strongarm the Motorazr.com domain from its original owner? Well, the panel assigned to delibrate on the claim has made its decision, and disagreed with Motorola's claims. The panel said the site was not......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Motorola vs. Motorazr.com: Round 1 Goes Against Motorola&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Remember the case of Motorola trying to strongarm the Motorazr.com domain from its original owner? Well, the panel assigned to delibrate on the claim has made its decision, and disagreed with Motorola&#8217;s claims. The panel said the site was not&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
